arXiv began limiting each submitter to two new papers per calendar month on October 1, with no more than three active submissions at once, per arXiv. Rejected papers count toward the monthly limit. The cap applies across every subject category.
Submissions reached 40,363 in September 2026, up from 20,569 two years earlier and 9,869 in September 2016. The cs.AI category grew sixfold in two years. September's volume produced almost 9,000 support tickets for a moderation corps made up of volunteers. arXiv says moderators are seeing more thin papers, single projects split into several submissions, and dense AI-written manuscripts.
The limit attaches to the submitting account. Co-authors are unaffected, so a five-person lab has ten slots a month if each person submits. Papers on hold from an earlier month do not use the new month's allowance, though they count toward the three-active ceiling. Papers deleted before announcement do not count.
This reaches outside academia. AI labs and startups use arXiv to timestamp results, and many batch several papers around conference deadlines. A team that routes everything through one account now hits the cap in a deadline week. arXiv's stated reason is fair use of moderator time, and it says a small share of authors produce a large number of low-quality submissions. The practical effect is a quota on the fastest publishing channel in machine learning.
Bottom Line
Two papers a month per submitter, three in the queue, effective now. If your team publishes on arXiv, spread submissions across authors' accounts and plan deadline batches a month ahead. A rejected paper spends a slot too.